Every finance team has a story about ACFR.
It starts with spreadsheets — dozens of them — scattered across departments. Then comes the formatting. The last-minute edits. The race to balance totals before the deadline hits. And maybe, if you’re lucky, the version you submit is the version everyone meant to send.
It’s not just pressure. It’s chaos. And for many teams, it feels unavoidable. But it isn’t.
The ACFR is a public-facing, board-reviewed, audit-scrutinized artifact. But the process to produce it often looks like:
Even experienced teams with great instincts and attention to detail struggle to keep everything aligned. The more manual the process, the harder it is to catch what’s off — until it’s too late.
The deadline pressure will always be there. But the chaos? That comes from how the work gets done.
Manual workflows create fragility. One change ripples through the whole document, and you chase it across pages. You lose time, trust, and sometimes accuracy. And you repeat it the following year.
What if you didn’t have to?
Taming the ACFR process starts with how you structure the work:
At Gravity, we designed our platform for teams in the thick of this process. We’ve worked with governments that used to spend months rechecking every number. Now, they spend that time improving the report, not just getting by with it.
When your ACFR process is connected, traceable, and predictable:
You don’t just reduce chaos. You unlock clarity, accuracy, and time.
If you’re in government finance, pressure is part of the job. But chaos doesn’t have to be.
The ACFR is too important to rebuild from scratch every year. Your team deserves better for the final report and the path that gets you there.
Want to take the pressure off next year’s ACFR? We’ll show you how Gravity helps public finance teams move from rework to absolute control.